>O2 SCIENCE > WHY TIME TRAVEL IS IMPOSSIBLE?

>


Big Bang simulated in metamaterial shows time travel is impossible

by Lisa Zyga

   report Big Bang model

In the toy Big Bang model, light rays spread out as a function of time, similar to the expansion of spacetime in a diagram of the real Big Bang. Image credit: Smolyaninov and Hung.
(PhysOrg.com) — By observing the way that light moves inside a metamaterial, researchers have reconstructed how spacetime has expanded since the Big Bang. The results provide a better understanding of why time moves in only one direction, and also suggest that time travel is impossible.

In their study, electrical engineers Igor Smolyaninov and Yu-Ju Hung from the University of Maryland have built a metamaterial by patterning plastic strips on a gold substrate, which they then illuminated with a laser. Because the of electromagnetic spaces (which describe the metamaterial) is similar to the mathematics of (which describe spacetime), the way light moves in the metamaterial is exactly analogous to the path – or “world line” – of a massive particle in (2+1)-dimensional Minkowski spacetime.
As the researchers explained in their study, a Big Bang event occurs in the metamaterial when the pattern of light rays expands relative to the time-like z-dimension. This instance marks the beginning of cosmological time, which moves forward from the Big Bang in the direction of the Universe’s expansion. After the Big Bang event, the light rays expand in a non-perfect way, scattered by random defects in the plastic strips until they reach a high-entropy state. This behavior represents the thermodynamic arrow of time, showing that entropy tends to increase in an isolated system.
The significance of these observations is that the cosmological and the thermodynamic arrows of time coincide, with both of them pointing “forward” (just as we perceive them). While most scientists theorize that the statistical and the cosmological arrows of time are connected in this way, this experiment is one of the few ways in which scientists can “replay the ” and experimentally demonstrate the connection.
The researchers also showed that this novel model of time could provide insight into that involves closed timelike curves (CTCs). CTCs are world lines of particles that form circles so that they return to their starting points.
At first, the researchers thought that, if they could build a metamaterial in which light could move in a circle (and so that its mathematical description were identical to particles moving through spacetime), then they could create CTCs.
But when further analyzing the situation, they found restrictions on how light rays could move in the model. Although certain rays could return to their starting points, they would not perceive the correct timelike dimension. In contrast, rays that do perceive this timelike dimension cannot move in circles. The researchers concluded that Nature seems to resist the creation of CTCs, and that time travel – at least in this model – is impossible.

More information: Igor I. Smolyaninov and Yu-Ju Hung. “Modeling of Time with Metamaterials.” arXiv:1104.0561v1 [physics.optics]

© 2010 PhysOrg.com

Enhanced by Zemanta

>O2HUB VISIONS >>> Masks Of The Universe

>

Last week one of our astute blog community members recommend the book Masks of the Universe by cosmologist Edward Harrison. I was delighted to see this work come up. This is one of my favorite discussions of Cosmos and Culture and so I wanted to pass along the recommendation with a little extra background.
Harrison’s book is an unusual addition to the popular science literature. It is not simply a recounting of Big Bang physics and its triumphs. Instead, Harrison begins with a fundamental, but slippery, question. What is interplay between the raw data the world gives us, and the image of the world we create in response. These responses are what Harrison calls “Universes” and his masks are meant to be the physical science version of Joseph Campbell’s Masks of God. As Harrison describes it:

Wherever we find a human society, however primitive, we find a universe and wherever we find a universe, of whatever kind, we find a society; both go together, and one does not exist without the other. Each universe coordinates and unifies a society, enabling its members to communicate their thoughts and share their experiences. Each universe determines what is perceived and what constitutes valid knowledge, and the members of each society believe what is perceived and perceived what is believed.

Harrison has chapters on prehistory, on the first urban societies, on the Greeks etc all the way up to the modern era. Each chapter unpacks the ideas expressed in the quote above – there is more to the story of cosmos and culture than simply being right or wrong about an objective reality. One can not doubt that there is a reality out there that pushed back on us but, in Harrison’s view, that reality is always viewed through the prism of culturally constructed paradigms.
In the end Harrison does not answer the most pressing question – to what extend has science finally “gotten it right”?
To what extent is the Universe revealed by science THE UNIVERSE and to what extent is it another mask?

But that is small criticism given this book’s big ambitions.
It is a thoughtful and unusual work and well worth more discussion on these pages.

related visions: