>New Record High for GOLD – But Why?

>

By David Berman

There was nothing standing in gold’s way on Tuesday afternoon, with bullion prices hitting a new record high in nominal terms. Gold touched $1,452 an ounce, up about $19, stretching its gains to 10.5 per cent since it began to recover from an early year dip in late January.
This raises the question why — which is rarely an easy question to answer when you’re dealing with gold.
You certainly can’t blame recent comments from Federal Reserve chairman Ben Bernanke. In a speech on Monday, he downplayed the threat of inflation, noting that gains in various commodity prices would not likely translate into anything more than a “transitory” increase in inflation, with food and energy prices in particular likely stabilizing eventually. He added that if he’s wrong, the Fed would respond, presumably with higher interest rates.
So if inflation isn’t a problem, what is? Bloomberg News is calling the latest surge in gold a “chaos” hedge: Investors might be loading up on gold as a hedge against Portugal’s debt crisis, the ongoing conflict in Libya and the nuclear crisis in Japan. However, none of these three issues – which have been simmering for some time – was looking more chaotic on Tuesday afternoon.
Perhaps investors are merely responding to comments from Jing Ulrich, chair of China equities and commodities at JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM). She said on Tuesday that China’s demand for gold will expand as official holdings rise. Right now, China’s gold holdings amount to 1,054 tonnes, an increase of 76 per cent since 2003.
“They probably have increased the holdings but we don’t know the figures,” she said, according to Bloomberg News. “It’s probably 2 to 3 per cent of the [foreign exchange] reserves, so it has potential to increase.”

About the author: Market Blog
Market Blog picture
Market Blog is a daily compendium of market news and analysis. You can find the blog at GlobeandMail.com, the website of Canada’s national newspaper The Globe & Mail, or at The Globe’s investment website, Globe Investor. Market Blog is primarily written by David Berman. He has has been… More

>AMP GOLD >> The Gold Bubble That Just Won’t Pop

>


The gold price reached a new all-time high yesterday of $1,457 an ounce and most investors are probably just shaking their heads at the craziness of it all – who in their right mind would pay almost $1,500 for a dumb ‘ol one ounce gold coin? Of course, they were shaking their heads at $1,200 an ounce, $1,000 an ounce, $725 an ounce, $500 an ounce, and so on, calling it a bubble ever since the price started rising about ten years ago when you could have bought the metal for about $300 an ounce. That’s one tough gold bubble…
In Frank Holmes’ latest commentary over at U.S. Global Investors, he explains some of the reasons why the current gold bubble just doesn’t seem ready, willing, or able to pop. The chart below (click to enlarge) is offered up as evidence that, in a world full of increasingly suspect paper money and paper assets where more investors are looking for something other than dodgy paper, the yellow metal remains under-owned.

Citing a recent presentation by Eric Sprott of Sprott Asset Management, Holmes notes that new investment in gold over the last ten years totaled about $250 billion versus almost $100 trillion that went into other financial assets over that same time. That’s not to say that, as a percent of all assets, it will ever get back to the levels seen prior to 1990, but, based on everything that’s been happening in the world lately, it’s certainly headed in that direction.

About the author: Tim Iacono
Tim Iacono picture
Tim Iacono is the founder of the investment website ‘Iacono Research’, a subscription service providing market commentary and investment advisory services specializing in natural resources. He also writes the financial blog ‘The Mess That Greenspan Made’, an irreverent look at the many and… 

>AMP GOLD >> GOLD IS THE KING… SILVER THE QUEEN

>

Gold Real Money in a World of Fiat Currency

Since the Masters of the System have decided to arbitrarily “move the goalposts” to suit themselves by printing money in unlimited quantities, fixing interest rates at artificially low levels, and backstopping the bond market etc, it is incumbent on us as investors to find a fixed point of reference and safe anchorage, the better to weather the financial storms that their crassly irresponsible policies are bringing upon us. That fixed point of reference is gold. As gold is real money it is aloof from the mess and mayhem that now exists in the world of fiat and which is rapidly getting worse – and here it is necessary to make a crucially important point, which is that at this time in world history you have to completely reorder your thinking with respect with gold.

STOP nervously going online or picking up the newspaper to check the price of gold against fiat – it is IRRELEVANT. The question you have to ask yourself is this – do you want to preserve your real wealth or not? – because if you do you are going to have to transfer your assets out of fiat and into tangibles, the King of which is gold. If gold is the King then silver may fairly be called the Queen – these two precious metals are like the sun and the moon, and are rapidly becoming the two leading lights in the investment firmament, which is a fair analogy – and you will recall that the Incas, who worshipped the sun, were big fans of gold.
The situation is gravely serious, for we talking about more than speculative gain here, although we will obviously go for that. Much more seriously we are talking about financial survival and possibly even physical survival. You will all have read the ridiculous predictions about the world population ballooning to about 11 billion people by 2040 or so. That is not going to happen because the life support systems and resource supplies of this planet will buckle and fail long before the population can reach such horrifying levels, leading to mass famine, wars and widespread panic and desperation, and we are already seeing signs of it with rapidly rising food prices leading to social unrest and revolutions. If you thought that the last century was bad what with 2 World Wars, the Cold War and nukes being used on cities etc, wait till you see what happens during this century – which will probably end up being known as the “Century of The Cull” – compared to what is coming the last century will seem like a golden age. From an evolutionary standpoint this is of course necessary, as the bloated human population, which is wrecking the planet, needs to be dramatically cut back into line with what is sustainable. As mankind has shown no mercy whatsoever in its ever increasing exploitation of the natural world by doing such things as chopping down the rainforests and fishing out the seas and and is bringing global ecosystems to the verge of collapse, it can likewise expect no mercy from either God or gaia.
Right now the Masters of the System, driven as ever by short-term personal gain, and unable to face the consequences of their earlier actions, are steering the world towards a hyperinflationary abyss, and unfortunately the momentum in this direction has now become unstoppable. Up until quite recently it was thought that it was primarily the US that was headed in this direction, but it would appear from their actions – and from the price of gold in their currencies – that many other nations are keen to follow the example of the US, kind of like the old Tom Lehrer song We will all go together when we go. You can tell how old this song is not just from the attire and demeanour of Tom Lehrer, but from the fact that he refers to “3 billion hunks of well done steak”, which would now have to be revised to 7 billion, i.e. the world population has more than doubled since he sang this song.
Given the gravity of the situation and the widespread fraud and plain theft that we can expect to follow as a matter of course, it is of the utmost importance that those investors wanting to buy gold and silver aim for physical possession of these metals or at the least have them stored with a reputable depository that is out of reach of government thieves and other brigands who are likely to call looking for it when TSHTF. Under no circumstances trust ETFs as gold and silver investments – a classic line from them in the future might be “We’re awfully sorry – we really did have the gold, but we loaned it out to the Treasury”. In this respect the stocks of the better gold and silver mining companies are regarded as a much safer place to park funds.
The growing appreciation by investors of the increasing worthlessness of fiat is what has caused them to pile into not just gold and silver, but commodities in general, the bullmarket in which has been energized even further by the growing leveraged dollar carry trade. Back in the 1970’s when investors sought protection from the ravages of inflation they also went for collectibles such as paintings and stamps, but in the more brutal world we are headed towards such investments are going to be regarded as foppish and impractical – paintings can be slashed with a knife or a sword, stamps can be burnt and instantly become worthless – it’s a lot harder to destroy gold. While the oil price will also rise, particularly if the Mid East really gets out of hand, you can’t go storing barrels of oil in your back yard because of their bulk and the fire risk, so for private investors it has to be gold or silver.
Returning to our central theme in this update which is to change your thinking so that you regard gold as real money and fiat as the instrinsically worthless rubbish that it really is, you can start to view gold as a constant plus, or constant +. Constant because whatever happens in the crazy world of fiat, gold retains forever its intrinsic value. The plus refers to the all important fact that as fiat approaches its nemesis, exponentially increasing sums of money are going to be directed at buying gold by those seeking safe haven for capital. Since the supply of gold is finite, and relatively very limited compared to most other investments, it will mean that those wanting to gain possession are going to have to bid the price up and up and up. Classic principles of supply and demand dictate that in such a situation the price will go through the roof, meaning that gold should rise enormously in price compared to just about everything else – the relatively orderly advance we have seen up to now will morph into an accelerating parabolic arc. This is what we mean by constant +, and the price won’t be coming down in a hurry either – not until the fiat money system blows itself to smithereens and is totally discredited, as happened in Zimbabwe. At this time we can expect some kind of gold standard to be reintroduced and the irresponsible opportunists who brought about this collapse will likely have fled to haciendas in Argentina or some other far flung place.
In the light of the accelerating global monetary crisis we are going to take a more liberal approach as we review the charts for gold, and are not going to go into paroxisms because of a slight break of a trendline, for example. Keeping in mind that gold is real money and that the currencies are essentially rubbish we will now review the charts.

Starting with the 4-year chart for gold we can see that after completing a rare high level Head-and-Shoulders continuation pattern, gold has essentially been in a steady uptrend above its rising 200-day moving average, with any approach to this average marking a buying opportunity. Some writers have tried to claim that a bearish Rising Wedge is forming in gold, but have taken the top line of the Wedge as starting from the early 2008 high. This is technically inaccurate because you cannot draw the top line of a new uptrend from the peak of a prior uptrend. If there is a bearish Wedge forming, the top line of it would be drawn from the Nov 09 peak, but similar to today you could have claimed that a bearish Wedge was forming after the price peaked in June of last year, as shown on the 2-year gold chart, but it never came to pass.

At this point there is one scenario we should note where gold could drop sharply against the dollar over an intermediate timeframe. We know that public opinion on the dollar is very bearish and also that dollar carry trade speculators are highly leveraged at this time – if they were to become unsettled at the prospect of rising rates in the US, which at some point is likely to be forced on the Fed, they might scramble to close out their positions and drive a temporary dollar spike, kind of like 2008, but this time round PM stocks are unlikely to get dumped as in 2008 because the hedge funds are now short the sector, instead of heavily long as they were in 2008. The key point to note here though is that even if speculators switch back into the dollar temporarily and drive it higher, that won’t stop gold rising in other currencies – on the contrary it could rise even faster – and it won’t stop the relentless global expansion of the money supply.

Even against the Swiss Franc, considered to be the “Rolls Royce” of fiat, gold has been marching steadily higher and looks to be a buy after the recent consolidation, and it has of course been rising even more strongly against most other major currencies, a dramatic example being that of the shoddy British Pound.
This collection of charts by the National Inflation Association of the US is required reading for all of you – don’t just skim read this – TAKE THE TIME to really take this on board. Not only do these startling charts reveal the groundwork that has been laid in the US for hyperinflation, but they also strip out the intentional distortions of the massaged CPI figures to reveal the true upside potential for gold and silver (and other commodities).
So there you have it. Buy as much physical gold as you can lay your hands on, make sure it’s safely stashed out of reach of bandits. Avoid paper gold and silver and ETF scams. Gold shares in the better producers or near producers should do really well and be good investments. In general get out of fiat of all kinds, especially currencies and bonds/Treasuries etc which are garbage – and when you’ve done that, QUIT WORRYING and get on with your life.
Readers in California are advised to remain on a heightened state of alert and preparedness for a possible major earthquake, as set out in the article An important message for readers in California. Tectonic plates in 3 of the 4 quadrants of the Pacific Basin have made major moves over the past year, Chile, then New Zealand and most recently Japan, which is increasing the chances that the 4th quadrant, the NE quadrant, will move soon.
While this Gold Market update may appear to be gloomy and negative (not about gold but about the world in general), it is only intended to be realistic. Remember that by hoping for the best and being prepared for the worst, you will be much better placed to ride out rough times than the “ignorance is bliss” crowd, which happens to comprise the majority of the population. Furthermore, being prepared for the worst does not imply sinking into a state of negative apathy. No matter how bad it gets there are always things you can do to improve the lives and circumstances of the community around you and those who are prepared to face things as they are and take the necessary steps to protect themselves and those closest to them will have the strength and resolve to do just that.

By Clive Maund
CliveMaund.com
For billing & subscription questions: subscriptions@clivemaund.com
© 2011 Clive Maund – The above represents the opinion and analysis of Mr. Maund, based on data available to him, at the time of writing. Mr. Maunds opinions are his own, and are not a recommendation or an offer to buy or sell securities. No responsibility can be accepted for losses that may result as a consequence of trading on the basis of this analysis.

Mr. Maund is an independent analyst who receives no compensation of any kind from any groups, individuals or corporations mentioned in his reports. As trading and investing in any financial markets may involve serious risk of loss, Mr. Maund recommends that you consult with a qualified investment advisor, one licensed by appropriate regulatory agencies in your legal jurisdiction and do your own due diligence and research when making any kind of a transaction with financial ramifications.

>The Gold Report

>

Atwell: Mideast Mayhem to Drive Gold Higher

Brian Sylvester of The Gold Report
Friday, Feb 25, 2011

As Casimir Capital Managing Director Wayne Atwell sees it, further political unrest in the Middle East could push gold higher, while inflation risk and sovereign debt issues in Europe are longer-term price catalysts. He also shares his insights on small-cap investment in this exclusive interview with The Gold Report.

The Gold Report: In a recent interview with Bloomberg you said, “Gold’s gotten stronger because it’s no longer weak.” Can you explain that concept to our readers?


Wayne Atwell: Commodities and securities tend to trade on momentum. Gold had been exceptionally strong, but a lot of investors became nervous because gold appeared too strong and people started taking profits. Then the dollar strengthened and we received some more good economic news, which drove gold down again. Gold has corrected about 7% from its high late last year. Once it breaks through its support level, it could go meaningfully lower. It was in a negative technical pattern and once there is a certain technical pattern on the charts investors start dumping gold and go short. Some people don’t believe it, but many people invest based on charts and technical patterns. If enough people invest enough money, then it works.
Gold was on the verge of breaking down further when the Middle East uprisings began and investors became a bit anxious. So far, the citizens of two Arab countries have overthrown their governments. It’s been relatively peaceful, which is great, but you can envision a scenario in which it wouldn’t be peaceful. Saudi Arabia is likely to have some difficulties that may or may not result in a change of government, and now we’re hearing about protests in Iran. The probability is high that both those countries are going to have additional issues. They may not, but unrest in the Middle East has turned the gold price around.
TGR: That parallels what you’ve described in the past as an “event-driven market” for gold. Would further unrest in Arab countries push the gold price back above $1,400/oz.?
WA: I tend to think so, I guess it depends on what form that unrest takes. Obviously, the government changes in Egypt and Tunisia were relatively peaceful. But the uprising has already spread to Yemen and Saudi Arabia—and now there’s talk of revolts in Jordan and Iran. Saudi Arabia, as you’re probably aware, is responsible for about 11%–12% of global oil production. God forbid that country has a problem—that could cause a real crisis. Fighting in the Middle East is certainly an event that could push gold meaningfully higher. You will remember what happened in October 1973 when the Arabs cut off oil to the West and the oil price went through the roof. It caused massive anxiety and a very serious recession.
TGR: What are some other events that you anticipate could move the gold price this year?
WA: In terms of events, I’m worried about the sovereign debt situation in Europe. The European Union (EU) has dealt with liquidity issues for both Iceland and Greece into 2013, but it hasn’t solved the underlying problem; it’s just dealt with the short-term issue. Unless these countries start balancing their budgets, which is unlikely—come 2013, the same problem will resurface. A sovereign default in Europe is highly probable. Spain has an unemployment rate of +20%, which is just huge. That’s an issue, too.
In the U.S. a number of municipal governments are very deeply in the red. They haven’t funded their pensions and healthcare for their municipal workers. There’s a reasonably high chance that one or more of these municipalities could fail, which would cause a high degree of anxiety and force investors to dump municipal bonds, which again would result in investors’ flight to gold as a safe haven.
TGR: In an interview with BNN, you talked about the Chinese and American economies “laying the groundwork for inflation.” How are these countries doing that and what do you believe is the timeframe for dramatic inflation increases in both countries?
WA: I’ve been going to China for 30 years and I have seen a phenomenal change. I’ll just throw out a few numbers to put the country in perspective. China consumed about 3%–4% of the world’s commodities in 1985 and now consumes 35%–45% of global commodities, which is astounding. To put that in context, from 2000–2010, global steel consumption grew at a rate of 5% a year. Chinese steel consumption has grown at a compound rate of 17%. So, in 2000, China actually produced 127 million tons (Mt.) of steel; in 2010, it produced 626 Mt. of steel. Basically, the country grew its steel industry by 500 Mt. in 10 years, providing the bulk of global growth.
On average, commodity-consumption growth averages 2.5%, yet here we have steel growing at 5% over a 10-year period and China’s steel consumption growing at 17%. It’s unprecedented. That, in turn, has caused a shortage of metallurgical coal. Met coal is breaking out and will probably reach a new high shortly because China has gone from being an exporter to an importer. Iron ore is now within about $10 of its all-time high. About 10 years ago, China was about 70% self-sufficient in terms of iron ore; now it’s 30% self-sufficient, so China is driving up the iron ore price, as well.
TGR: It’s a similar story with copper.
WA: Yes, copper made a new high last week and China consumes 38% of the world’s copper; it’s only 15% self-sufficient, so 85% of its copper comes from offshore. The rapid growth in China is being driven by the need to move people from the country into the cities, and the country consumes a lot of material when it constructs new buildings, rail lines, power facilities, bridges and ports. China is transforming from an agrarian to an urban society, having moved about 15 million people per year into cities over the last 15 years. It’ll likely have to do that for another 10, maybe 20 years.
China is only 43% urban but it will likely become at least 60%, maybe even 70% urban within 20 years. This is putting a strain on the global supply of industrial materials—prices for many of which are at or close to all-time highs, which is inflationary. The mining industry has a pattern of looking for new mines and developing new properties but when you grow at a rate that’s faster than the historical norm, it puts extra strain on the industry. We’re not going to run out of these materials but we must go look in more remote locations to find the materials.
TGR: What about inflation in the U.S.?
WA: Here in the U.S., the government is out of control. Our government spending is frightening. Last year, we had a $1.6 trillion deficit. It’s coming down a bit this year, but it’s still going to be very high. The deficit is about 10% of GDP; historically, it peaked at 4%. Government spending is about 25% of GDP. We haven’t seen these numbers since the end World War II. We’re in uncharted territory—the government is spending too large a share of our GDP. The interest on our debt, as forecast by government budget office, is going to go from $350 billion this year to $900 billion within five years. Forget healthcare, social security, Medicare or Medicaid—we’re going to add +$500 billion to the interest expense. This will drive the dollar down and result in serious inflation.
In the case of China, industrial demand is pushing up commodity prices and creating inflation. As far as the U.S. is concerned, you can’t have this pattern of government spending in the reserve currency of the world without causing serious problems. There is every reason for investors to go into the gold market to put a certain percentage of their assets in gold for protection against super inflation.
TGR: Do you think these factors will push gold to an all-time nominal high in 2011?
WA: Gold made a new high late last year. It has made a new high 10 years in a row. We think it will make a new high of $1,600 this year and $2,000 within the next one to three years. We suggest buying on a correction; it probably won’t go much lower. We believe holding 5%–10% of one’s assets in gold makes sense.
TGR: Among other financial services, Casimir Capital puts together financings for companies, many of which are junior miners. Why does Casimir focus on the junior mining segment of the market?
WA: I wrote a piece on the junior gold industry recently, which makes a number of points. One is that the denominator is obviously much smaller for the gold juniors. If both a major and a junior gold exploration company find a 1 million-ounce (Moz.) gold deposit, it’s going to have a much more significant impact on the junior explorer’s share price. Only about 5 out of every 100 exploration discoveries is really of interest to majors because most of the very large gold properties have already been found.
It’s extremely difficult to find an exciting new gold property. So, if you’re spending money on gold exploration, the probability is you’re going to find a small gold deposit. But in many cases, the gold majors are prospecting for new exploration properties in their corporate finance department. They’re looking at and frequently buying intermediate or small gold companies with substantial gold deposits that the majors can develop themselves.
TGR: Yes, the gold majors essentially use the junior explorers as their exploration arm.
WA: Exactly. It’s like their exploration department. Gold deposits will be in production anywhere from 5–20 years. They’re generally small. Majors have to replace their depleting resources, plus people expect growth. It’s very expensive for a major to go out and find, and then develop gold properties. If, however, a junior develops a 0.5 Moz. deposit, it doesn’t have to build as much infrastructure. Developing a property as a junior is just a lot less expensive than it is as a major.
TGR: But they’re selling the gold for the same price.
WA: Exactly. The index we put together last year showed the juniors appreciated about 49% in 2010, whereas the majors were up roughly 27%.
TGR: Before we let you go, could you give us your outlook for gold over the next few months?
WA: Let’s go back to the event-driven motivation for moving the gold price. The events we don’t yet know about will likely determine the direction of the gold price. The underlying momentum is positive when you look at the U.S. budget, government spending and Europe’s sovereign debt problems. And the problems that governments have created will only get worse as populations age and Social Security obligations become greater—that’s certainly a problem. We’re all aware of those slower-moving issues, but I think what drives gold in the short term are events in the Middle East and any sovereign debt default. Unless there’s a major unexpected event, we’ll probably see the gold price break out to a new high in the second quarter. We’re roughly halfway through the first quarter now, so we look for the gold price to be rangebound the next two to six weeks before breaking out in the second quarter. But it’s subject to material impact by unexpected events, which always have a way of happening.
TGR: Thank you for talking with us today, Wayne.
Mr. Atwell has more than 35 years of experience in the field of investment analysis for the metals and mining industries. He currently serves as a managing director of Casimir Capital L.P. From 1991–2006, Mr. Atwell was a managing director at Morgan Stanley where he was the Global Group Team leader in equity research and built and managed a 12-member global metal and mining team of analysts. From 1983–1991, Mr. Atwell was a VP at Goldman Sachs covering the metals and mining industries. He was also a VP and principal in the privately held Davis Skaggs, a regional research firm, from 1977–1983. And from 1969–1977, he worked for Merrill Lynch as a senior metals and mining analyst. Mr. Atwell has toured 200 mines and 300 steel mills on six continents. He was selected as one of the 10 best buy-side stock pickers by Institutional Investor magazine several times and was rated as one of the top analysts in metals and mining by Institutional Investor and Greenwich Associates for more than 20 years. Mr. Atwell graduated from Pennsylvania State University in 1969 with a degree in mineral economics. He earned his MBA from the Stern School of Business at New York University in 1974.


Visit The GOLD Report – a unique, free site featuring summaries of articles from major publications, specific recommendations from top worldwide analysts and portfolio managers covering gold stocks, and a directory, with samples, of precious metals newsletters. To subscribe, please complete our online form, or send an email with the word ‘Subscribe’ in the subject field.
The GOLD Report is Copyright © 2008 by Streetwise Inc. All rights are reserved. Streetwise Inc. hereby grants an unrestricted license to use or disseminate this copyrighted material only in whole (and always including this disclaimer), but never in part. The GOLD Report does not render investment advice and does not endorse or recommend the business, products, services or securities of any company mentioned in this report. From time to time, Streetwise Inc. directors, officers, employees or members of their families may have a long or short position in securities mentioned and may make purchases and/or sales of those securities in the open market or otherwise. Streetwise Inc. does not guarantee the accuracy or thoroughness of the information reported.
The Gold Report is published by Streetwise Inc. Information provided here should not be considered as advice or as an offer or enticement to buy, sell or trade; nor shall any errors or omissions be the basis for any claim, demand, or cause for action. The contents of this publication, including any opinions and analysis, are strictly intended for educational use. Furthermore, information obtained from all quoted sources is believed to be reliable and is offered in good faith. Northwest Territorial Mint does not accept responsibility for any trading losses incurred from reliance upon this information. Readers are encouraged to consult with a financial advisor before making major investment decisions.
Northwest Territorial Mint makes no assurances about any other web site which you may access through this one or which may link to this web site. When you access a non-Northwest Territorial Mint web site, please recognize that it is independent from Northwest Territorial Mint, and that Northwest Territorial Mint has no control over the content on that web site.

>Currency Chaos: Where Do We Go From Here?

>

‘The most important initiative you could take to improve the world economy would be to stabilize the dollar-euro rate.’

By JUDY SHELTON

Global monetary relations are in disarray. Exchange rates fluctuate wildly among the world’s major trade partners, spawning talk of protectionism and a currency war. Gold is soaring as the dollar slides, and economists debate whether the biggest threat to U.S. recovery is deflation or inflation.
We need a giant of economics to help explain all this and recommend a remedy. Where in the world is Robert Mundell when you need him?
As it turns out, Mr. Mundell—the Columbia University professor who advocated the hard-money, low-tax policy mix that broke stagflation in the early 1980s, and who received the Nobel Prize in 1999 for his work on exchange rates—happened to be in New York this week. It’s a lucky break. When he’s not at his 500-year-old castle in Italy, the “father of the euro” is usually en route to his next lecture somewhere in the world.
“What is wrong with the global economy today?” I ask him. “How do we fix this monetary mess?” We are sitting on a comfortably worn sofa in the parlor of his apartment near campus, drinking tea. Plush fabrics drape the walls, along with Baroque paintings in ornately-gilded frames. And there are piles of books in the adjoining rooms. Really. Thick piles of books are stacked in corners, heaped against walls, balanced on short wooden tables.
“The problem started before World War I,” Mr. Mundell commences. “The gold standard was working fairly well. But it broke down because of the war and what happened in the 1920s. And then the U.S. started to become so dominant in the world, with the dollar becoming the central currency after the 1930s, the whole world economy shifted.
“Think of it like the solar system: It started with gold at the center, as the sun, but then Jupiter got bigger and bigger until all the planets started circulating Jupiter instead.”
“And the U.S. is Jupiter?” I deduce.
“Yes,” he affirms, “and the spread of the dollar was just miraculous as it became the anchor for the Bretton Woods fixed exchange rate system after World War II. The price of gold was fixed at $35 an ounce in 1934, but by the time the U.S. got through the Korean War, the Vietnam war, with all the associated secular inflation, the price level had gone up nearly three times.
“Gold became very undervalued; European countries traded in dollars for gold until the U.S. lost more than half its stock. The U.S. went off gold in 1971, under Nixon, and nobody else has gone on it again.”
Mr. Mundell, 77, is clearly in his element as he traces the monetary history of the last century. Like his apartment, he radiates a charmingly disheveled elegance, jaunty in jeans and an open-necked cream shirt.
“So our problems today,” I posit, “are related to the fact that the Bretton Woods system of fixed exchange-rates linked to gold broke down?”
“The system broke down,” he hastens to explain, “not because of fixed rates. Fixed exchange rates operate between California and New York . . . the system broke down because there was no mechanism to keep the world price level in line with the price of gold.”
Atop the closest mound of books is a volume titled: “Shaping the Post-War World: The Clearing Union.” It features the collected writings of John Maynard Keynes from 1940-1944, when the famous British economist was helping to design a new international monetary order to provide a stable foundation for a world economy devastated by war.
“Are you thinking,” I venture, “that maybe it’s time to start figuring out the design for a new international monetary order? Should the U.S. offer new proposals regarding exchange rates and monetary policy?”
Mr. Mundell, who is Canadian, looks troubled. “I don’t think the U.S. has any ideas, they don’t have strong leadership on the international economic side,” he replies. “There hasn’t been anyone in the administration for a long time who really knows much about the international monetary system.”
He elaborates that it would not be possible today to forge a monetary system with the dollar as the key reserve currency, as President Franklin Roosevelt and Treasury Secretary Henry Morganthau did in the 1940s. “To be fair, America’s position is not nearly as strong now,” he concedes. “But what has disappointed me is the reluctance of the U.S. to take into account this big movement in the rest of the world to do something about restoring stability to the international monetary system.” He frowns. “They ignore it, as if the dollar’s exchange rate is a mere domestic matter.”
I take a sip of tea. “Do you think it has to do with our relationship with China?” The U.S. is threatening to impose tariffs on Chinese goods if Beijing doesn’t make them more expensive by revaluing its currency.
“The U.S. berates China for its exchange rate policy, which Washington doesn’t like,” Mr. Mundell says, noting that discriminatory tariffs against China might not be legal under the treaty provisions of the World Trade Organization. “But one-sided pressure on China to change its exchange rate is misplaced.”
Shaking his head, Mr. Mundell asserts: “The issue should not be treated as a bilateral dispute between the U.S. and China. It’s a multilateral issue because the U.S. deficit itself is a multilateral issue that is connected with the international role of the dollar.”
He goes on to explain that the dollar bloc includes China and other Asian countries—except Japan—but that the euro now constitutes the rest of the world. “The euro today is the counter-dollar,” he says. “The most important initiative you could take to improve the world economy would be to stabilize the dollar-euro rate.”
He thinks the European Central Bank, along with the Federal Reserve, should intervene in currency markets to limit movement in the world’s single most important exchange rate, pointing out that the dollar and euro together represent 40% of the world economy.
“If the U.S. demurs, are we headed toward a global currency war?” I ask.
Mr. Mundell looks tentative. “I don’t think it will come to a currency war,” he says. “The U.S. is still very powerful; it would be an unequal battle. But it’s important to have a high-level conference to explore opinions for reforming the world monetary system. The Europeans should be involved, as well as emerging countries.” He mentions that French President Nicolas Sarkozy recently spoke about the need to bring experts together for an intellectual discussion on the issue, perhaps in China.
“So you think a fixed exchange-rate system is more conducive to global free trade and global economic recovery than floating rates?” I ask.
Mr. Mundell registers surprise that I would even inquire. “The whole idea of having a free trade area when you have gyrating exchange rates doesn’t make sense at all. It just spoils the effect of any kind of free trade agreement.”
oming from the man who helped design Europe’s single currency, it makes perfect sense. Since its introduction in 1999, the euro has eliminated exchange-rate fluctuations among the 16 trade partners who have adopted it. In just over a decade, the euro has become the world’s second largest reserve currency after the dollar, and the second most-traded currency in foreign-exchange markets.
Which brings to mind another question. “What do you think about the rise in currency trading by banks, with some $4 trillion now turning over daily in global currency markets?”
Mr. Mundell thrusts out his arms. “It’s part of the sickness of the system! These currencies should be fixed, as they were under Bretton Woods or the gold standard. All this unnecessary noise, unnecessary uncertainty; it just confuses the ability to evaluate market prices.”
Mr. Mundell has a knack for boiling things down to simple terms. He grew up on a four-acre farm in Ontario, went on to earn a Ph.D. from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, and would ultimately challenge the renowned Milton Friedman at the University of Chicago during the late 1960s. Both economists were strong proponents of free markets, but Mr. Mundell disagreed with Mr. Friedman’s advocacy of floating exchange rates.
The sound of a buzzer indicates lunch has arrived. Mr. Mundell suggests that we continue our discussion at the table and politely invites his assistant Ivy Ng, who has been taking careful notes, to join us.
“We’ve been talking about the possibility of global monetary reform,” I continue, deciding to switch gears. “Let’s talk a bit about domestic monetary policy. What do you think the Federal Reserve should be doing right now?”
It’s a seamless transition for Mr. Mundell. “The Fed is making a big mistake by ignoring movements in the price of the dollar, movements in the price of gold, in favor of inflation-targeting, which is a bad idea. The Fed has always had the wrong view about the dollar exchange rate; they think the exchange rate doesn’t matter. They don’t say that publicly, but that is their view.”
“Well,” I counter, not particularly savoring the role of devil’s advocate, “I suppose Fed officials would argue that their mandate is to try to achieve stable prices and maximum levels of employment.”
Mr. Mundell looks annoyed. “Well, it’s stupid. It’s just stupid.” He tries to walk it back somewhat. “I don’t mean Fed officials are stupid; it’s just this idea they have that exchange-rate effects will eventually be taken into account through the inflation-targeting approach. In the long run, it’s not incorrect—it takes about a year. But why ignore the instant barometer that something is happening? The exchange rate is the immediate reaction to pending inflation. Look what happened a couple weeks ago: The Fed started to say, we’ve got to print more money, inflate the economy a little bit. The dollar plummeted! You won’t get a change in the inflation index for months, but a falling exchange rate—that’s the first signal.” Clearly on a roll, I press a bit. “You mentioned gold?”
‘The price of gold is an index of inflation expectations,” Mr. Mundell says without hesitation. “The rising price of gold shows that people see huge amounts of debt being accumulated and they expect more money to be pumped out.” He purses his lips. “They might not necessarily be right; gold could be overvalued right now.”
Sensing that the soup is getting cold, I decide to cut to the chase: “What would be your winning formula today? What advice would you give to Washington that would help turn around our moribund economy?”
He pauses to think, but only for a moment. “Pro-growth tax policies, stable exchange rates.”
And then, with his spoon poised over his own bowl, he smiles sweetly and beckons for us to begin. “Buon appetito.” Ms. Shelton, an economist, is author of “Money Meltdown: Restoring Order to the Global Monetary System” (Free Press, 1994). She is co-director of the Sound Money Project at the Atlas Economic Research Foundation.

>Silver Hits 31-Year High as Mints Ration Silver Coins

>

Intense investor demand for bullion pushed silver to a new record today, touching a 31-year high of $31.77 an ounce before settling at $3.57, up 94.1 cents (+3.07%) on the day.
Mints in several countries, including Austria, Canada and the USA, sold record numbers of silver coins in January, and selling has reached such a fever pitch that these mints have had to ration their selling. In a Financial Times interview, Royal Canadian Mint head of bullion sales David Madge said, “We have sold everything we can produce in silver, and have demand for at least twice that volume.”
The price of silver increased by an impressive 84 percent in 2010 (outperformed only by palladium’s 96 percent rise), and with the fundamentals that drove silver up last year still in place, many analysts see silver growing substantially in 2011, although a repeat of last year’s 84 percent rise is unlikely.
Silver continues to out-perform gold, as illustrated by the silver-gold ratio (the number of ounces of silver that buys an ounce of gold) falling under 44, its lowest point in almost five years. Gold is currently down 2.5 percent from its 2010 close, although its price appears to be back on the upswing.
Silver, like gold, is currently reaping the benefits of investor anxiety over the heightening turmoil in the Middle East, as well as a declining U.S. dollar, which is taking a hard hit from rising U.S. unemployment, rising inflation, and the U.S. Federal Reserve’s ongoing quantitative easing program, which is printing $75 billion in new greenbacks each month.

Source: Gold Investor & Jay Taylor

More on this topic  
 

Why I’m Buying Silver at $30
Silver Headed to $50 an Ounce in 2011


Related posts

>Precious metals >> Top investment

>

Precious metals were the top performing investment for the second consecutive year during 2010 with their value soaring by 42% as people sought a safe haven from inflation, research indicates.
It is the fourth time in the past five years that precious metals have topped the tables for the best asset class, as continuing uncertainty over the prospects for the global economy caused investors to flock to gold, silver and platinum, according to Lloyds TSB.
The value of precious metals has surged by 365% during the past 10 years, nearly double the increase for the next best performing asset during the same period – residential property, which made a gain of 198%.
The steep increase in precious metal prices seen during 2010 was driven by silver, with its value jumping by 80%, significantly outstripping the 29% rise in the price of gold and the 20% increase for platinum.
The group said the price of silver had been boosted by pressure on the supply of the metal, as demand remained high from both investors and industries which use it.
Commodities were the second best performing asset class during 2010, offering returns of 30%, while they were the third best during the past decade, with a 176% increase in value.
They were also the best performing asset during the first two months of 2011, driven by a 38% jump in the price of cotton since the start of the year, due to a combination of rising demand from Asia and falling supply as some of the major cotton producing countries were hit by flooding.
All nine asset classes produced a positive return during the past year, although people who held their money in cash would have seen it rise by just 0.6%, while residential property did little better with a gain of 1.2%.
UK shares and commercial property both returned 14.5%, while the value of international shares increased by 10.6%.
Suren Thiru, economist at Lloyds TSB, said: “Going forward, the level of demand from emerging economies, particularly from China and India, is likely to remain an important determinant of many assets prices as well as the pace at which the global economic recovery continues.”

Related articles

>What happens to gold in an oil crisis?

>

What happens to gold in an oil crisis?
It goes up.

When the first crisis hit back in 1973 in the wake of the Arab-Israeli war, nothing happened immediately. But then as the impact of the embargo began to be felt in the US – and in particular as oil began to be rationed – that changed.

<a href=”http://adserver.adtech.de/adlink|3.0|567|2913133|0|170|ADTECH;loc=300″ target=”_blank”><img src=”http://adserver.adtech.de/adserv|3.0|567|2913133|0|170|ADTECH;loc=300″ border=”0″ width=”300″ height=”250″></a>

The price of gold doubled in less than four months from $85 an ounce to $180, with the peak coming just as the embargo ended. The price then eased slightly. But as GMP Securities point out, the end result was that it stabilised in a much higher range – $130-$150 – than it had previously held.
The same thing happened the next time round. As the Iranian Revolution and then hostage crisis developed, the gold price spiked to $850: the rise started as the Shah lost control and kept going when Carter deregulated the oil price. Then it went parabolic when the US embassy in Tehran was seized, topping out only as the Carter Doctrine (which stated that anything that threatened US energy supplies threatened US security) was announced.
However, when gold fell back, it didn’t, as you might have expected it to do, fall back to $200. Instead it moved into yet another higher range – around the $600 level. On both occasions the rise – and its new high range – was driven by two things, geopolitical risk perceptions and the inflation triggered by the rising price of oil.
So what now? You could argue that we haven’t yet got an energy crisis: the price of oil is up but not yet startlingly so and at the same time energy dependence is not quite what it was back in 1973. But what if the crisis in the Middle East spreads? According to George Albino of GMP, the same thing will happen again: inflation and a geopolitical risk premium will once again “have a very significant impact” on short term and, just as in the 1970s, on medium term gold prices too.